An Argument Against Breed-Specific Legislation Essay -- Argumentative,

To say â€Å"pit bull,† however, is a vague reference to several pit bull types, which are considered separate breeds by registries like the American Kennel Club (AKC). Each type has a slightly different breeding history; many began with the breeding of bulldogs with terriers to produce a loyal, compact and tenacious breed (â€Å"American Pit Bull Terrier†). The standard three pit bull types most often mentioned by name in breed-specific legislation include the American Pit Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. That is not the extent of the legislation, however, which also includes dogs that â€Å"substantially conform to the breed standards established by the American Ken e 2010. Web. 22 Nov. 2010. Cohen, Judy, and John Richardson. â€Å"Pit Bull Panic.† Journal of Popular Culture 36.2 (2002): 297. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Nov. 2010. â€Å"Dog Bite: Fact Sheet.† Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC, 1 Apr. 2008. Web. 13 Nov. 2010. â€Å"Dogfighting Fact Sheet.† The Humane Society of the United States. 2 Nov. 2009. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. Melvindale, Mich., Municipal Code art. II,  § 4-137 (1990). Perry, April M. â€Å"Guilt by Saturation: Media Liability for Third-party Violence and the Availability Heuristic.† Northwestern University Law Review 97.2 (2003): 1045. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2010. â€Å"The Truth About Pit Bulls.† ASPCA. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, n.d. Web. 22 Nov. 2010. â€Å"U.S. Dog Bite Fatalities January 2006 to December 2008.† DogsBite. 20 Apr. 2009. Web. 22 Nov. 2010.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Rhetorical Analysis - Essay Example Whereas Douglass addresses the mass audience, comprising people from all walks of life, on the US Independence ceremony, Langston’s audience comprises of people who were mentally prepare to judge Langston’s words from a legal as well as a humanitarian vantage point. Indeed Douglass’s audiences were less prone to embrace legal argument than Langston’s audiences are. Therefore these two men’s rhetoric strategies are also different from each other. Necessarily Douglass has to make his speech comprehensible by making it elaborative and embellishing it with emotional tropes, whereas Langston’s speech appears to be substantive and fraught with poetic imageries, rhetoric devices, especially prepared for an audience of reasoning intellect. Before an audience which largely comprises white people, both Langston and Douglass have to associate the African American with religious, more specifically with Christian, sentiment in order to draw their sympathy . Both of these two speakers have done so by using the rhetoric device of metonymy. While Douglass addresses his people as the â€Å"emancipated people of God† (321), Langston describes the ability of the emancipated slaves to escape as something â€Å"God-given powers† (Langston, 1859, p 233). ... Another two mentionable metonymies used by Langston and Douglass are respectively â€Å"colored people† and â€Å"colored brethren†. Out of a number of parallelisms used in Douglass’s speech a remarkable one is: â€Å"It [Independence Day] carries your minds back to the day, and to the act of your great deliverance; and to the signs, and to the wonders, associated with that act, and that day† (Douglass, 1852, p 321). In this sentence, Douglass describes the recalling functions of the Independence Days in a series of related infinitive phrases. But a more striking parallelism occurs in the preceding sentence: â€Å"[Independence], to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God.† (Douglass, 1852, p 321) In this line, he draws a parallel between â€Å"the 4th July† and the â€Å"Passover†. Similarly â€Å"In Address to the Court† Langston uses another parallelism to expose the invalidity of the â€Å"Fugitive of Slave Law†. He says, â€Å"The [Fugitive Slave Law] under which I am arraigned is an unjust one, one made to crush the colored man, and one that outrages every feeling of Humanity, as well as every rule of Right.† (Langston, 1859, p 234) In opposition to the ‘Fugitive Slave Law’, Langston is quite successful to depict the African American, as a people struggling for their liberty, through the use of another parallelism: â€Å"And there were others who had become free†¦Ã¢â‚¬Ëœby escaping†¦eluding the blood-thirsty patrols†¦outrunning bloodhounds and horses, swimming rivers and fording swamps, and reaching at last†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Langston, 1859, p 233) Meanwhile in the same sentence, he refers to the self-contradiction of the freedom of the slave, enacted by the 13th Amendment, through the use of irony. Indeed the Fugitive Slave Law was

Under take a deep and wide Market (or industry) analysis for Heineken Essay

Under take a deep and wide Market (or industry) analysis for Heineken - Essay Example What therefore has been the key to success in Heineken? Well, it is the uniqueness of the marketing strategy and the industry analysis that has been adopted by Heineken over time. In a keen study of Heineken’s strategic platforms, one can simply notice why Heineken is destined for even a brighter future (Duetsch 2002, p. 78). This paper aims at analysing the beer industry, with reference to Heineken, being a key player in the industry. What makes the Heineken strategy unique and what are some of the marketing and analytical platforms pursued by this giant (Heineken) in the beer industry. David A. Aaker is credited for having come up with AAKER Marketing Analysis, a marketing strategy that puts emphasis and focus on the micro- external environment in which an organization operates. Most organizations today have adopted the AAKER Marketing Analysis in their market analysis, strategy so as to understand more their various immediate external environment (Bohrer 2007, p. 37). An analysis of the immediate external business environment is critical to the success of any organization. In the beer industry, specifically, Heineken has employed AAKER Marketing Analysis with the main aim of creating a competitive advantage over other industry players in the following ways: It is a policy at Heineken that any market ventured into must be fully exploited. In order to fully satisfy their customers, Heineken did their market analysis by first identifying the size of the market that they (Heineken) intended to operate into. In analysing the market size, Heineken put focus on the number of their consumers and potential consumers; followed the quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis of what can be the demands of those customers (Bohrer 2007, p. 43). With this analysis put into consideration, Heineken has been able to understand the needs of their customers, thereby working towards satisfaction of